| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090103181333.GA19413@elte.hu> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:13:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Mike Travis <travis@....com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > Also, while bisecting this window of commits i found that neither would > build successfully due to a typo - and the typo is fixed in 095fb96. So > since we rebase this portion anyway due to excessive amount of bugs, > i'll make it fully bisectable by rebasing right at 095fb96, backmerge > the fixlet from eeff031 and redo the whole series dropping the two bad > patches. Since this portion of the tree has no appreciable testing value > the rebase is the right thing to do here. okay, i've done this now and pushed out the resulting tree to tip/cpus4096-v2. It is a no-content-changed reshuffle of the tail ~10 commits of tip/cpus4096: $ git diff cpus4096..cpus4096-v2 $ i dropped the two broken patches i bisected today, and backmerged a fixlet to make it more bisectable, and reordered fixes next to the merge point - and the new changes now come after that. this finally is something that has no known regressions and looks pushable to Linus. I've started the -tip tests, lets see how well this holds up now. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists