linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901031225020.3179@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:28:38 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3



On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> ok. The pending regressions are all fixed now, and i've just finished my 
> standard tests on the latest tree and all the tests passed fine.

Ok, pulled and pushed out.

Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an 
allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going 
to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space 
just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on 
stack?

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/