[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sknzs79y.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:19:21 +0100
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@....no>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, werner@...nelius-consult.de,
frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Winchiphead 340/1: full baud rate and status/control line support
]] Alan Cox
| Some niggles but this is a big improvement to the code.
Thanks. New patch incoming RSN.
| > static int ch341_set_baudrate(struct usb_device *dev,
| > + struct tty_struct *tty,
| > struct ch341_private *priv)
| > + baud = CH341_BAUDBASE_FACTOR / t1;
| > +
| > + if (baud && tty)
| > + tty_encode_baud_rate(tty, baud, baud);
|
| Can you really get a speed below 1 baud ?
Unsure what you mean here? Why would you ever end up with baudrates
below 1?
| > + control = priv->line_control;
| > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
| > +
| > + return ch341_set_handshake(port->serial->dev, control);
| > +}
|
| This could race another set_handshake ? I'm not sure it matters and I'd
| suggest that stuff gets fixed after this is submitted separately
What's the easiest way to fix this?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists