| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c62985530901040754m15ed74caib2665e00b5037707@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:54:06 +0100 From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com> To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, davej@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootchart: improve output based on Dave Jones' feedback 2009/1/4 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:36:18 +0100 > "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote: > >> >> BTW, it looks like the async initcall feature has not been merged >> upstream, even not in tip/master. Was it too >> risky, not enough tested or something? > > Linus didn't quite like how it was done (to put it mildly). > > I've redone it this weekend (and am now cleaning the code up for > posting later today hopefully)... So I will wait for your patches :-) Since you are involved again in fastboot, perhaps you will use the boot tracer which now traces the sched events. And I'm sure this sched tracing can be improved for your needs or anything. Don't hesitate to report any feedbacks. Thanks. > Linus was right (as usual); the new way is much better both in terms > of code cleanness and in terms of faster boot. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists