[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4960E0BB.4070500@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:15:55 +0000
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
To: david@...g.hm
CC: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Ben Goodger <goodgerster@...il.com>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linasvepstas@...il.com,
"Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <jeff@...owsky.org>,
MentalMooMan <slashdot@...eshallam.info>,
Travis Crump <pretzalz@...hhouse.org>, burdell@...ntheinter.net
Subject: Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years
2008-2009
david@...g.hm wrote:
> so are you saying that other 'correct' OS's have patches issued every
> time a leap second is declared so that they have an in-kernel table of
> them to use to calculate the correct time?
I think the number of other "correct" OSes that actually step the time
on leap seconds is not that large (at least doing the announcement via
NTP). According to http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo-real.htm#AEN2499
leap seconds are only changed via stepping if you have the right kernel
discipline (notes on how to check whether a given OS has the kernel
kernel discipline are mentioned on
http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo-kernel.htm#AEN2220 ).
I have a feeling that OSX doesn't do it (there's a mailing list post
from 2005 where someone was trying to add FreeBSD's ntp_adjtime to
Darwin
http://lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-kernel/2005/Jan/msg00004.html ).
Additionally folks I know using ntpd synchronized OSX machines said
their machines were off by one second right after the new year.
Windows is also known not to do it without slewing:
http://www.meinberg.de/english/info/leap-second.htm#os .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists