[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090104172319.GA1238@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:23:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mpparse.c fix style problems
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello Ingo,
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > i think it would be cleaner to rename all the the mpc->mpc_X fields to
> > mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site. (we already
> > know that it's an 'mpc' entity - no need to duplicate that in the field
> > too)
> >
>
> I send [PATCH -tip 0/7] x86 rename all fields mpc_X to X based on this.
>
> Currently I rename fields of few mpc_X structures from
> arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec_def.h. In this file struct
> intel_mp_floating is still remaining with mpf_X fields, Is this also
> need to be fixed ? if yes then mpf_intel name is OK ?
>
> Similarly in arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h :
> 1. struct mp_config_ioapic with mp_X fields (what name will be best ?)
> 2. struct mp_config_intsrc with mp_X fields
>
> These are also used in arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
>
> Please let me know should I fix mp_X things first or should I proceed
> further in mpparse.c as per your suggestions.
i think those should be standardized to mpc_X too, and the fields should
lose their mp_ prefix.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists