[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090104101353.05e8df09@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:13:53 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:05:15 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:29:40AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >From 2087b546abddced50fa73ea9a71b5a040ae1026e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > >2001
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:32:28 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
> >
> > This patch makes part of the scsi probe (which is mostly device
> > spin up and the partition scan) asynchronous. Only the part that
> > runs after getting the device number allocated is asynchronous,
> > ensuring that device numbering remains stable.
>
> Is this really a big win? Were you using the async scsi scan code
> already?
just checked;
my box has CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y set for both cases
it seems to be about 0.1 seconds win still though...
sounds little, but a kernel boot should be less than a second, so that
is still 10%. And it's obviously also disk dependent..
(I used libata connected disks obviously)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists