[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090104221356.GA32357@shareable.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:13:57 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Embedded Linux mailing list <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh
Rob Landley wrote:
> In a private email, Bernd Petrovitsch suggested "set -- $i" and then
> using NAME=$1; PERIOD=$2. (I keep getting private email responses
> to these sort of threads, and then getting dismissed as the only one
> who cares about the issue. Less so this time around, but still...)
> This apparently works all the way back to the bourne shell.
If you're going "all the way back to the bourne shell", don't use "set
-- $i"; use "set x $i" instead, and don't expect to do any arithmetic
in the shell; use "expr" or "awk" for arithmetic.
(Not relevant to kernel scripts, imho, since you can always assume
something a bit more modern and not too stripped down).
(I have 850 Linux boxes on my network with a bourne shell which
doesn't do $((...)). I won't be building kernels on them though :-)
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists