[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49614284.8040201@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:13:08 +0000
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
CC: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tytso@....edu,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, rdunlap@...otime.net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: document ext3 requirements
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is there linux filesystem that can handle that? I know jffs2, but
> that's unsuitable for stuff like USB thumb drives, right?
This raises the question that if nothing can handle it which FS is the
least bad? The last I heard people were saying that with cheap SSDs the
recommendation was FAT [1] but in the future btrfs, nilfs and logfs
would be better.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/14/129
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists