[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4961432A.80509@davidnewall.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:45:54 +1030
From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To: david@...g.hm
CC: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Ben Goodger <goodgerster@...il.com>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linasvepstas@...il.com,
"Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <jeff@...owsky.org>,
MentalMooMan <slashdot@...eshallam.info>,
Travis Crump <pretzalz@...hhouse.org>, burdell@...ntheinter.net
Subject: Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years
2008-2009
david@...g.hm wrote:
> so are you saying that other 'correct' OS's have patches issued every
> time a leap second is declared so that they have an in-kernel table of
> them to use to calculate the correct time?
No. Exactly the contrary. I'm saying that through use of zoneinfo, for
example, no kernel support is required for leap seconds. And! this
provides correct results for seconds-between two dates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists