[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495FFECB.5040001@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:11:55 +0100
From: Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@...osome.natur.cuni.cz>
To: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tytso@....edu,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, rdunlap@...otime.net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: document ext3 requirements
Duane Griffin wrote:
> 2009/1/3 Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@...osome.natur.cuni.cz>:
>> Why does not "mount -ro" die when it would have to replay the journal
>> with a message that user must run fsck.ext3 in order to be able to mount
>> it albeit read-only? Still I would prefer having an extra switch to
>> force mount RO while not touching the journal for disk forensics.
>> I think that would also prevent the cases when a LiveCD/rescue distribution
>> would not mount+replay it automagically but user would really have to
>> provide the switch to the command. I am really not using the recovery
>> boot cd to touch my partitions in some cases unwillingly.
>
> Well, that would make things rather tricky. As in, shutting down
> uncleanly would render your system unbootable.
??? If I am booted off a CD/DVD drive I just do not want my system
to be touched. I am fine if the dist mounts my drives automagically
in read-only mode but if that currently forces journal replay then no,
thanks. ;)
M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists