linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: Let %pR handle NULL pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From:	Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Let %pR handle NULL pointers

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 09:10 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > >
> > > Have %pR print "[NULL]" for the resource range when passed a NULL pointer.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be much nicer to just do it for _all_ pointer types?
> >
> > IOW, a patch more like the appended.
>
> Agreed.

I thought of doing that too, but then all the various %pX formats would all
have to print the same for NULL pointers.  For instance a resource prints
out like "[0x1000-0x100f]", so I chose "[NULL]" for printing a null
resource pointer.  Maybe "[]" or "[-]" would be better?  A null MAC address
could be ":::::" or "x:x:x:x:x:x".  "N.U.L.L" or "x.x.x.x" for a null IP4
address.  And so on.  So the printout looks nicer when a NULL pointer isn't
a bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/