[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0901031827380.25853@shell2.speakeasy.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Let %pR handle NULL pointers
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 09:10 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > >
> > > Have %pR print "[NULL]" for the resource range when passed a NULL pointer.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be much nicer to just do it for _all_ pointer types?
> >
> > IOW, a patch more like the appended.
>
> Agreed.
I thought of doing that too, but then all the various %pX formats would all
have to print the same for NULL pointers. For instance a resource prints
out like "[0x1000-0x100f]", so I chose "[NULL]" for printing a null
resource pointer. Maybe "[]" or "[-]" would be better? A null MAC address
could be ":::::" or "x:x:x:x:x:x". "N.U.L.L" or "x.x.x.x" for a null IP4
address. And so on. So the printout looks nicer when a NULL pointer isn't
a bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists