linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: Let %pR handle NULL pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231062493.15389.105.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:48:13 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Let %pR handle NULL pointers


> I thought of doing that too, but then all the various %pX formats would all
> have to print the same for NULL pointers.  For instance a resource prints
> out like "[0x1000-0x100f]", so I chose "[NULL]" for printing a null
> resource pointer.  Maybe "[]" or "[-]" would be better?  A null MAC address
> could be ":::::" or "x:x:x:x:x:x".  "N.U.L.L" or "x.x.x.x" for a null IP4
> address.  And so on.  So the printout looks nicer when a NULL pointer isn't
> a bug.

And how often is that ?

Seriously... 

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/