[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105091034.GA5440@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:10:34 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
snakebyte@....de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
niv@...ibm.com, manfred@...orfullife.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rcutree grace-period-latency bug on small systems
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Kudos to Andi Kleen for finding a grace-period-latency problem! The
> problem was that the special-case code for small machines never updated
> the ->signaled field to indicate that grace-period initialization had
> completed, which prevented force_quiescent_state() from ever expediting
> grace periods. This problem resulted in grace periods extending for more
> than 20 seconds. Not subtle. I introduced this bug during my inspection
> process when I fixed a race between grace-period initialization and
> force_quiescent_state() execution.
>
> The following patch properly updates the ->signaled field for the
> "small"-system case (no more than 32 CPUs for 32-bit kernels and no more
> than 64 CPUs for 64-bit kernels).
>
> I believe that this patch should be included for 2.6.29.
>
> Located-by: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Tested-by: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> rcutree.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to tip/core/urgent, thanks guys!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists