[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105091249.GB5440@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:12:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, snakebyte@....de, andi@...stfloor.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, manfred@...orfullife.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make treercu safe for suspend and resume
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Kudos to both Dhaval Giani and Jens Axboe for finding a bug in treercu
> that causes warnings after suspend-resume cycles in Dhaval's case and
> during stress tests in Jens's case. It would also probably cause failures
> if heavily stressed. The solution, ironically enough, is to revert to
> rcupreempt's code for initializing the dynticks state. And the patch
> even results in smaller code -- so what was I thinking???
>
> This is 2.6.29 material, given that people really do suspend and resume
> Linux these days. ;-)
>
> Located-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Located-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Tested-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> rcutree.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
applied to tip/core/urgent, thanks guys!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists