[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020901050200h3fd6ce71qacd5e2dff282a9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:00:58 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: __nr_to_section - make it safe against overflow
Hi Cyrill,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -980,9 +986,12 @@ extern struct mem_section mem_section[NR
>
> static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
> {
> - if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
> + unsigned long idx = SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= NR_SECTION_ROOTS);
> +
> + if (idx >=NR_SECTION_ROOTS || !mem_section[idx])
> return NULL;
Looks good to me but I have minor nitpick. You might want to write the
above like this:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= NR_SECTION_ROOTS))
return NULL;
to separate the error condition from the normal case where we don't
have a mem section.
> - return &mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
> + return &mem_section[idx][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists