[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105100318.GC7645@localhost>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:03:18 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: __nr_to_section - make it safe against overflow
[Pekka Enberg - Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:00:58PM +0200]
| Hi Cyrill,
|
| On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
| > @@ -980,9 +986,12 @@ extern struct mem_section mem_section[NR
| >
| > static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
| > {
| > - if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
| > + unsigned long idx = SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr);
| > + WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= NR_SECTION_ROOTS);
| > +
| > + if (idx >=NR_SECTION_ROOTS || !mem_section[idx])
| > return NULL;
|
| Looks good to me but I have minor nitpick. You might want to write the
| above like this:
|
| if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= NR_SECTION_ROOTS))
| return NULL;
|
| to separate the error condition from the normal case where we don't
| have a mem section.
|
| > - return &mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
| > + return &mem_section[idx][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
| > }
|
Hi Pekka,
thanks, indeed! I forget that WARN_.. do return a value :)
Will fix shortly.
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists