[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901051416.04816.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:16:03 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: "Cheng Renquan (程任全)"
<crquan@...il.com>
Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Matt Helsley" <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
mhiramat@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: KPROBE linking error (who's the maintainer of kernel/power/) ?
Hi,
On Monday 05 January 2009, Cheng Renquan (程任全) wrote:
> with this .config
>
> CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
> CONFIG_CGROUP_FREEZER=y
> CONFIG_MODULES=y
> CONFIG_FREEZER=y
> CONFIG_PM=y
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n
>
> the kernel will end compiling with error:
>
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `check_safety':
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.28/kernel/kprobes.c:126: undefined reference to
> `freeze_processes'
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.28/kernel/kprobes.c:139: undefined reference to
> `thaw_processes'
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.28/kernel/kprobes.c:139: undefined reference to
> `thaw_processes'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
So there is a bug, thanks for the report.
> By read kernel/kprobes.c, I found there maybe a bug:
>
> 1. "check_safety" in "kernel/kprobes.c" call thaw_processes if both
> CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PM defined,
> 2. "thaw_processes" function is implemented in "kernel/power/process.c",
> 3. but it is only used if CONFIG_FREEZER defined, from <linux/freezer.h>,
> 4. else (CONFIG_FREEZER undefined) it's a null macro defined in
> <linux/freezer.h>,
> 5. but process.o only get compile if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP defined, from
> "kernel/power/Makefile",
>
> Now I'm confused on how to resolve this?
I'd make process.o depend on CONFIG_FREEZER (patch below).
> What's the relation of PM, PM_SLEEP, and FREEZER?
PM_SLEEP depends on PM and FREEZER is defined in kernel/Kconfig.freezer as
config FREEZER
def_bool PM_SLEEP || CGROUP_FREEZER
> Which modification of the following will be better?
> 1. modify kernel/Kconfig, let KPROBES depends more?
> 2. modify kernel/kprobes.c, let the conditional compile depends more?
> 3. modify include/linux/freezer.h, move thaw_processes to include/linux/pm.h?
> 4. modify kernel/power/Makefile, let kernel/power/process.c compile on
> less condition?
>
> Furthermore, there seems no entry for maintainers of "kernel/power/",
> who maintain that subdir please add your name to the MAINTAINERS file?
> I just grab some latest touchers of kernel/power/ and kernel/kprobes.c
> as the recipients here.
I'm one of the maintainers.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
Subject: PM: Fix freezer compilation if PM_SLEEP is unset
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Freezer fails to compile if with the following configuration
settings:
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
CONFIG_CGROUP_FREEZER=y
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_FREEZER=y
CONFIG_PM=y
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n
Fix this by making process.o compilation depend on CONFIG_FREEZER.
Reported-by: Cheng Renquan <crquan@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
kernel/power/Makefile | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/Makefile
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
endif
obj-y := main.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += process.o console.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += console.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += process.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION) += swsusp.o disk.o snapshot.o swap.o user.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) += poweroff.o
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists