[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105132102.GA27855@clifford.at>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:21:02 +0100
From: Clifford Wolf <clifford@...fford.at>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, i2c@...sensors.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, khali@...ux-fr.org,
adrian@...boldt.co.uk
Subject: [PATCH] Incremental i2c-mpc driver fix for multi-master i2c busses.
Incremental i2c-mpc driver fix for multi-master i2c busses.
This is an incremental bugfix for the i2c-mpc driver. It is based
on the bugfix I've sent on 2008-12-22:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/22/99
There still was a remaining problem with multi-master i2c busses
when an i2c bus access is interrupted by a unix signal while
waiting for bus arbitration.
This is an extreamly rare case but I managed to stumble over it in
multi master i2c performance tests.
Tested with a freescale MPC8349E host cpu.
Signed-off-by: Clifford Wolf <clifford@...fford.at>
--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c (revision 2216)
+++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c (working copy)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
schedule();
if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + timeout)) {
pr_debug("I2C: timeout\n");
- writeccr(i2c, 0);
+ writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
result = -EIO;
break;
}
@@ -119,10 +119,10 @@
if (unlikely(result < 0)) {
pr_debug("I2C: wait interrupted\n");
- writeccr(i2c, 0);
+ writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
} else if (unlikely(!(i2c->interrupt & CSR_MIF))) {
pr_debug("I2C: wait timeout\n");
- writeccr(i2c, 0);
+ writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
result = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
while (readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MBB) {
if (signal_pending(current)) {
pr_debug("I2C: Interrupted\n");
- writeccr(i2c, 0);
+ writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
return -EINTR;
}
if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + HZ)) {
@@ -369,6 +369,15 @@
goto fail_add;
}
+ /* Make sure the adapter is already in master mode some time before
+ * the first xfer to make sure arbitration control had enough time
+ * to monitor the bus. The CCR_MEN flag should never be cleared without
+ * makeing sure there is some delay between setting it again and
+ * starting the first transfer..
+ */
+ writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
+ udelay(100);
+
return result;
fail_add:
--
The great thing about Object Oriented code is that it can make small,
simple problems look like large, complex ones.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists