[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105132407.GC3313@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:24:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, bastian@...di.eu.org, daniel@...ac.com,
xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6][v5] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
On 12/30, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> I'd just make the flag a parameter to send_signal() directly.
> Then you can just change kill_pid_info_as_uid (or its replacement)
> to call send_signal() with that new flag (and the 'group' flag)
> directly instead of using the trivial __group_send_sig_info wrapper.
Ah, good. Can't understand why I didn't think about this before!
But, perhaps, it is better to add the new helper, __send_signal()
or whatever which has the new "from_ancestor_ns" argument. Then,
static int send_signal(...)
{
bool from_ancestor_ns = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info)) {
from_ancestor_ns = !task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t));
}
#endif
return __send_signal(..., from_ancestor_ns);
}
but this is cosmetic issue.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists