[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49616B0B.5000102@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:06:03 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: infrastructure for supporting binary record
>>
>> Just for curiosity. Why do you need such a binary tracing?
>> Do you need it because a string output is really too slow for your needs?
Hi, Frederic Weisbecker,
We have
1) lots of kinds events source(FUNCTION trace, TRACE_CTX, tracepoint, markers ...)
2) a generic and mature events log buffer - trace/ringbuffer.c
3) a generic and mature trace framework - trace/trace.c trace_ouput.c
But we don't have a generic events log format, we record different
events with different record formats: TRACE_FN, TRACE_CTX, TRACE_GRAPH_RET,
TRACE_SPECIAL, ... We use different struct for recording different
formats.
Too many kinds different formats, so we need a generic events log format.
This patch provide generic events log format.
Actually, We can use:
__ftrace_bprintk(0, "# %ld %ld %ld\n", arg1, arg2, arg3)
instead of TRACE_SPECIAL.
(maybe I should remove the "unsigned long ip" arg for __ftrace_bprintk()
and trace_vbprintk(), users need know the call_addr, just use "%pS")
And binary record is a little slower than string output.
Lai.
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> warning: I haven't looked at the patch details
>
> But I would love to use something like this to provide the exact
> contents the userspace blktrace utilities want.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists