[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901051146470.27085@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:48:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/kmemtrace: normalize the raw tracer event to
the unified tracing API
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > kernel/trace/trace_kmemtrace.c | 345 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> btw., i renamed this to kernel/trace/kmemtrace.c. Mentioning 'trace' twice
> is enough already ;-)
Should we rename all the kernel/trace/trace_(.*)\.c to kernel/trace/\1.c ?
Although I do like the trace in the function name, because it groups them
nicely together, and keeps ftrace.c and ring_buffer.c stand out from the
rest.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists