[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4962579E.9080901@euromail.se>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:55:26 +0100
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, jg@...top.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: Add a detailed multi-touch finger data report
protocol (rev2)
Peter Hutterer wrote:
[...]
>
> To clarify: the MT_TOUCH_MAJOR is to track a touchpoint over time, and the
> BLOB_ID to compile a arbitrarily shaped touchpoint within the same event?
MT_TOUCH_MAJOR is the major size of the touching object, or "pressure" in
case the size of the approaching object (MT_WIDTH_MAJOR) is not available
to compare the size to. The touch and position packets are sent to the
multitouch X driver, where the actual finger tracking takes place. Thanks
for the chance to clarify this.
> Would it make sense to allow specification of a blob as bit/bytemask? There
> are a few devices that can do detection of multi-color non-rectangular
> touchpoints, especially camera-based systems. Limiting these to a sequence of
> rectangles means dropping information that may be useful for certain tasks
> (e.g. fingerprint detection).
> OTOH, a rectangle as bounding box with an accompanying (optional) bytemask can
> pass this data on to prospective clients.
Very interesting idea, although I believe it is beyond the scope of the
current patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists