linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <496174EB.4030601@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:48:11 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> In any case, I do apologize -- since I didn't see anything from you I
> incorrectly assumed that you had given up on this patch.  Please accept
> my apologies!

It's my fault.

I'm a very low-yield developer.

I have given up on unaccepted cleanup-patches, kfree_rcu() is not a
cleanup for reducing lines of code, it has some significances for kernel.

> 
> Would it be possible for you and Manfred to agree on a common patch, and
> to have one of you submit it with both of you having Signed-off-by on it?
>
All are OK.

I NAK-ed only for deferring kfree_rcu() being accepted.

I'm not concerned about whether I'm patches' Author or I'm in the
Signed-off-by list.

Thanks,

Lai.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/