[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901051139410.3057@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:44:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] cpumask: update pci_bus_show_cpuaffinity to use
new cpumask API
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> Can you resend these two against my linux-next branch?
Btw, Jesse, what's the schedule for merging the pci thing.
I'm currently planning on -rc1 next weekend, which gives us time to do at
least a shortened -rc2 before people are at LCA. And the suspend/resume
changes are some of the more "exciting" (aka scary) parts of the whole
merge window, so I'd rather get them merged with a few days to go, rather
than just before -rc1.
In fact, they are probably more scary than the cpumask changes, since at
least the cpumask issues are likely to not be a big deal with any normal
sane config (ie you really do have to enable MAXSMP to hit the stack usage
issues). So if you end up waiting for those, I'd rather prefer to first
merge the rest of the PCI code.
Or did the PCI late-suspend/early-resume patches go in somebody elses
tree and I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists