[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20090105195613.GL6165@tatooine.rebelbase.local>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:56:13 +0100
From: markus reichelt <ml@...eichelt.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A SuSE riddle
* Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:46 AM, markus reichelt <ml@...eichelt.de>
> >> wrote: 2.) Because CAB files are for windows silly trid :)
> >
> > A .CAB wouldn't need a .src.CAB, a .CAB would just frakking work
> > :)
> >
>
> I don't think .CAB has ever been a standard distribution system for
> any Linux, BSD, or UNIX operating system. I can understand the need
> for a .tar.gz or .tar.bz2, but .cab?
Sarcasm. Sorry, collateral damage.
> And you can grab such .tar.{gz,bz2} files from here:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
No, SuSE once again broke with their patched kernel a tool, and we
are trying to get our hands on the borked patched sources so we can
diff the borked kernel to the working vanilla kernel in order to help
the sorry SuSE user left hanging midair by SuSE folks.
I signed the petition "Meteor Strikes To SuSE FIRST!" - Did you? ;-)
--
left blank, right bald
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists