linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4961B3A1.3070009@colorfullife.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:15:45 +0100
From:	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> I think these two are different questions.
>> vfree() still can not be called from softirq context now.
>> And I proposed vfree_atomic() for RCU, but it can not be accepted.
>>     
>
> And one would indeed either need to have a vfree_atomic() or have some
> mechanism that sent the vfree() to a workqueue or some such.
>   
ipc/util.c uses a workqueue (ipc_schedule_free):
The semaphore array structure can be large (documented with SEMMSL=8000 
around 16 kB, but there is no  hard limit), thus vmalloc is used.

But as long as there are just one or two users, I doubt that a generic 
system is worth the effort.

--
    Manfred

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/