linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090105.204934.65827705.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:49:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:37:58 -0800 (PST)

> > The default is extremely strict, which makes me check things out by
> > hand.  That's good, but as I add the change by hand after verifying
> > it's sanity I often make mistakes that result in things like the above
> > missed delete, so if I could ask git to be non-strict it would help me
> > out a lot.
> 
> Yeah, I know, "git am" really is very strict, and sometimes annoyingly so. 
> But it _can_ be overridden. And if the other end uses git to generate the 
> patch, you can also do a three-way apply, which really tends to work. But 
> that requires that the patch have the SHA1 ID's of the original blobs (and 
> that you have those blobs - ie that the patch was really generated against 
> something you already had)

That wouldn't have helped me in this case at all.

I had 4 firmware patches to apply, each one had to add entries
to the same file.

The first patch had to be skipped.

So the second one, which is the first one I added (which is the acenic
bogon with the missed delete), is the one GIT wouldn't take but patch
would.

GIT blobs wouldn't give me any help here, but I suppose the fuzz stuff
might have.

I really just want stupid 'patch' behavior.  I'll check the result
carefully, so just apply the thing instead of making me jump through
hoops. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/