[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090106061946.GA10026@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:19:46 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: debugfs & vfs file permission issue?
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:54:58AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 00:48, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:57:07PM -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> >> On 2.6.28-rc2, If I create a debugfs file with
> >>
> >> debugfs_create_x16("SPORT1_TX", 0200 , parent, 0xFFC00910);
> >
> > Um, are you are passing in a pointer to a known memory location
> > properly? Why would it be ok for the kernel to directly read that
> > location?
>
> it's a nommu system and the 0xffc00000+ addresses are always available
Writable but not readable? Isn't hardware fun :)
> >> Although the file shows up as write only (no read):
> >>
> >> root:/> ls -l /sys/kernel/debug/blackfin/SPORT/SPORT1_TX
> >> --w------- 1 root root 0 Jan 1
> >> 2007 /sys/kernel/debug/blackfin/SPORT/SPORT1_TX
> >>
> >> root:/> cat /sys/kernel/debug/blackfin/SPORT/SPORT1_TX
> >>
> >> Still works - and causes the read to occur, which crashes :(
> >
> > You're root, you can do anything :)
>
> any thoughts on how to declare debugfs files that are read or write
> only ? we'll have to add new helper functions or have it be a
> parameter or declare our own debugfs file ?
Just use debugfs_create_file() and use your own read/write functions to
prevent a read or write from happening no matter what. No new debugfs
infrastructure should be needed.
good luck,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists