[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231234297.3806.50.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:31:37 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 16:19 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 07:37 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > I'll rummage around.
>
> Seems to be about the only thing it could be, load balancing inflicting
> injury on very sensitive mysql+oltp pairs.
BTW, I verified this. Reverting all load-balancing changes fully
restored mysql+oltp peak, and brought mid-range throughput to the same
level as sched_mc=2 except at the log-jam end. (haven't looked at
vmark, though I'd expect it to be hurting a bit too, it's affinity
sensitive as well)
I expected sched_mc=2 to help an nfs mount kbuild, and it did, quite a
bit. I first tried an nfs4 mount, but after a while, the odd ipv6 80%
idle problem came back, so I reverted to nfs3. Full built time there
went from 4m25s to 4m2s. A nice improvement.
I haven't noticed anything on the interactivity front.
Personally, I'd go for sched_mc=2 as default. I value the fork/exec
load much more than sensitive benchmarks, though what hurts mysql+oltp
will certainly hurt others as well. We have a bit of conflict between
keeping CPUs busy and affinity cost. Something to work on.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists