[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090106113543.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:35:43 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:04AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The __crc_... reference is definitely bogus - none should survive with the
> new .c->.o rule. Could you find out what object file they originate from?
So can you, by use of arcane tool known as "grep"... It's in kernel/softirq.c
and that's genksyms parser being fucked in head. Look for TYPEOF_KEYW
in parse.y and you'll see. Especially amusing part is a kludge from
commit a89a0a2354ae666612968e254d650bfd04f11eb6...
> The others look like a tools side behavioral difference, as I never saw any
> such. Is this problem sparc32-specific (I tested x86 and ia64 only)? What's
> the binutils version used?
2.18.50.0.6.
And no, it's not tools side. What it is, AFAICT, is that sparc32 has
LDFLAGS_vmlinux = -r, which leaves a metric arseload of relocs that
wouldn't have survived into vmlinux otherwise. Look at .rela__ksymtab
in .tmp_vmlinux1, for example...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists