[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49637090.8010501@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:54:08 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: make UV support optional
Jack Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:03:48AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> UV is fairly rare.... and much of the support is already there to cope with
>> 32-bit builds. So this makes sense I think.
>>
>
>
> Looks ok to me. One suggestion though. There is a MAXSMP config
> option. I would suggest enabling UV if MAXSMP is enabled. This
> will help ensure that UV is tested more frequently & may minimize
> regressions.
>
>
> --- jack
Nick - would you add something like this to your patch? Thanks! Mike
---
Subject: x86: enable UV when MAXSMP is configured.
We want UV code to be tested even for non-UV architectures. Enabling
MAXSMP specifies "maximizing the system capabitlity" and UV is one of
these methods. Also helps distros select the correct config options
for their default configurations.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- linux-2.6-for-ingo.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6-for-ingo/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ config MAXSMP
bool "Configure Maximum number of SMP Processors and NUMA Nodes"
depends on X86_64 && SMP && DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERIMENTAL
select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
+ select X86_UV
default n
help
Configure maximum number of CPUS and NUMA Nodes for this architecture.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists