linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: make UV support optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090106152823.GB11114@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:28:23 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: make UV support optional


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ config MAXSMP
>  	bool "Configure Maximum number of SMP Processors and NUMA Nodes"
>  	depends on X86_64 && SMP && DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERIMENTAL
>  	select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> +	select X86_UV
>  	default n
>  	help

why not add this to X86_UV:

	default MAXSMP

this way it still stays fully configurable, but it is default-enabled if 
someone strives for a big SMP kernel.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/