linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-01-05-12-50 uploaded (ubifs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090106091341.99c59b83.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:13:41 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	dedekind@...radead.org
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-01-05-12-50 uploaded (ubifs)

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:11:44 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 14:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > WB_SYNC_HOLD got removed by
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fs-remove-wb_sync_hold.patch
> > 
> > I think I'll just switch that to WB_SYNC_NONE.  The `wait==0' mode is
> > just an advisory thing to help the fs shove lots of data into the
> > queues.  If some gets missed then it'll be picked up on the second
> > ->sync_fs call, with wait==1.
> 
> Sorry for the problems caused by this patch. Here is a fix for your
> convenience. Will you send it to Linus or I should do this?
> 
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] UBIFS: do not use WB_SYNC_HOLD

I can take care of that, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/