| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4963A6D9.9080206@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:45:45 -0500
From: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] waitfd
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Casey Dahlin wrote:
>
>> Linux now exposes signals, timers, and events via file descriptors
>> through signalfd, timerfd, and eventfd. This means programmers can use a
>> single select/[e]poll call to monitor all change in their program. This
>> patch aims to expose child death via the same mechanism.
>>
>> waitfd provides a file descriptor out of which may be read a series of
>> siginfo_t objects describing child death. A child process is reaped as
>> soon as its information is read. This means child monitoring too can be
>> performed with that same poll call.
>>
>> Patch is against v2.6.28
>>
>> --CJD
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
>> index f2bba78..134d83c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
>> @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@
>> #define __NR_dup3 330
>> #define __NR_pipe2 331
>> #define __NR_inotify_init1 332
>> +#define __NR_waitfd 333
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h
>> index d2e415e..b28eb07 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h
>> @@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_dup3, sys_dup3)
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_pipe2, sys_pipe2)
>> #define __NR_inotify_init1 294
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_inotify_init1, sys_inotify_init1)
>> +#define __NR_waitfd 295
>> +__SYSCALL(__NR_waitfd, sys_waitfd)
>>
>>
>
> Only for x86??
>
>
At the moment. I should have mentioned this earlier but I haven't made
the syscall table entries for archs I don't test on. That will change
once the rest of the change has settled out.
>> #ifndef __NO_STUBS
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
>> index d44395f..c796a8b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
>> @@ -332,3 +332,4 @@ ENTRY(sys_call_table)
>> .long sys_dup3 /* 330 */
>> .long sys_pipe2
>> .long sys_inotify_init1
>> + .long sys_waitfd
>> diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile
>> index d9f8afe..74c31fb 100644
>> --- a/fs/Makefile
>> +++ b/fs/Makefile
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER) += inotify_user.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EPOLL) += eventpoll.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ANON_INODES) += anon_inodes.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SIGNALFD) += signalfd.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_WAITFD) += waitfd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TIMERFD) += timerfd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EVENTFD) += eventfd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_AIO) += aio.o
>> diff --git a/fs/waitfd.c b/fs/waitfd.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0155a83
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/fs/waitfd.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
>> +/*
>> + * fs/waitfd.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Red Hat, Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>
>> + *
>> + * Largely derived from fs/signalfd.c
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/file.h>
>> +#include <linux/poll.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/signal.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
>> +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> +
>> +long do_waitid(int which, pid_t upid,
>> + struct siginfo __user *infop, int options,
>> + struct rusage __user *ru);
>> +
>> +struct waitfd_ctx {
>> + int ops;
>> + int which;
>> + pid_t upid;
>> +};
>> +
>>
>
> Please use kernel coding style: use tabs to indent, not <lots-of-spaces>,
> and struct members, functions, etc., are indented by one tab stop minimum.
>
>
Damnit. This is a mailer artifact. This is the first time thunderbird
has eaten a patch on me. I'll look in to it.
>> +static int waitfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + kfree(file->private_data);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int waitfd_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> +{
>> + struct waitfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
>> + long value;
>> +
>> + poll_wait(file, ¤t->signal->wait_chldexit, wait);
>> +
>> + value = do_waitid(ctx->which, ctx->upid, NULL,
>> + ctx->ops | WNOHANG | WNOWAIT, NULL);
>> + if (value > 0 || value == -ECHILD)
>> + return POLLIN;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Returns a multiple of the size of a struct siginfo, or a negative
>> + * error code. The "count" parameter must be at least sizeof(struct
>> siginfo)
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t waitfd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t
>> count,
>> + loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct waitfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
>> + struct siginfo __user *info_addr = (struct siginfo *)buf;
>> + int flags = ctx->ops;
>> + ssize_t ret, total = 0;
>> +
>> + count /= sizeof(struct siginfo);
>> + if (!count)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + ret = do_waitid(ctx->which, ctx->upid, info_addr, flags, NULL);
>> + if (ret == 0)
>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>> + if (ret == -ECHILD)
>> + ret = 0;
>> + if (ret <= 0)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + info_addr++;
>> + total += sizeof(struct siginfo);
>> + flags |= WNOHANG;
>> + } while (--count);
>> +
>> + return total ? total: ret;
>>
>
> return total ? total : ret;
> please.
>
>
I actually saw this used elsewhere in the kernel. Assumed I'd missed it
in the style guidelines :)
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct file_operations waitfd_fops = {
>> + .release = waitfd_release,
>> + .poll = waitfd_poll,
>> + .read = waitfd_read,
>> +};
>> +
>> +asmlinkage long sys_waitfd(int which, pid_t upid, int options, int unused)
>> +{
>> + int ufd;
>> + struct waitfd_ctx *ctx;
>> +
>> + /* Just to make sure we don't end up with a sys_waitfd4 */
>> + (void)unused;
>> +
>> + if (options & ~(WNOHANG|WEXITED|WSTOPPED|WCONTINUED))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (!(options & (WEXITED|WSTOPPED|WCONTINUED)))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>
> Use spaces around '|'.
>
>
Those 4 lines are copied almost exactly from kernel/exit.c. Is there
motivation to keep them consistent?
>> +
>> + ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ctx)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ctx->ops = options;
>> + ctx->upid = upid;
>> + ctx->which = which;
>> +
>> + ufd = anon_inode_getfd("[waitfd]", &waitfd_fops, ctx,
>> + (options & WNOHANG) ? O_NONBLOCK : 0);
>> + if (ufd < 0)
>> + kfree(ctx);
>> +
>> + return ufd;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> index f763762..bc34871 100644
>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> @@ -683,6 +683,16 @@ config EPOLL
>> Disabling this option will cause the kernel to be built without
>> support for epoll family of system calls.
>>
>> +config WAITFD
>> + bool "Enable waitfd() system call" if EMBEDDED
>> + select ANON_INODES
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + Enable the waitfd() system call that allows receving child state
>>
>
> receiving
>
> Kconfig help text should be indented by <tab><space><space>.
>
>
Likely more of the mailer eating the patch.
>> + changes from a file descriptor.
>> +
>> + If unsure, say Y.
>> +
>> config SIGNALFD
>> bool "Enable signalfd() system call" if EMBEDDED
>> select ANON_INODES
>> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
>> index 2d8be7e..b53e8ba 100644
>> --- a/kernel/exit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
>> @@ -1233,18 +1233,20 @@ static int wait_noreap_copyout(struct
>> task_struct *p, pid_t pid, uid_t uid,
>> int retval = rusagep ? getrusage(p, RUSAGE_BOTH, rusagep) : 0;
>>
>> put_task_struct(p);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(SIGCHLD, &infop->si_signo);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user((short)why, &infop->si_code);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(pid, &infop->si_pid);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(uid, &infop->si_uid);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(status, &infop->si_status);
>> + if (infop) {
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user(SIGCHLD, &infop->si_signo);
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user((short)why, &infop->si_code);
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user(pid, &infop->si_pid);
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user(uid, &infop->si_uid);
>> + if (!retval)
>> + retval = put_user(status, &infop->si_status);
>> + }
>> if (!retval)
>> retval = pid;
>> return retval;
>> @@ -1727,35 +1729,12 @@ repeat:
>> end:
>> current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
>> remove_wait_queue(¤t->signal->wait_chldexit,&wait);
>> - if (infop) {
>> - if (retval > 0)
>> - retval = 0;
>> - else {
>> - /*
>> - * For a WNOHANG return, clear out all the fields
>> - * we would set so the user can easily tell the
>> - * difference.
>> - */
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_signo);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_code);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_pid);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_uid);
>> - if (!retval)
>> - retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_status);
>> - }
>> - }
>> return retval;
>> }
>>
>> -asmlinkage long sys_waitid(int which, pid_t upid,
>> - struct siginfo __user *infop, int options,
>> - struct rusage __user *ru)
>> +long do_waitid(int which, pid_t upid,
>> + struct siginfo __user *infop, int options,
>> + struct rusage __user *ru)
>> {
>> struct pid *pid = NULL;
>> enum pid_type type;
>> @@ -1789,6 +1768,39 @@ asmlinkage long sys_waitid(int which, pid_t upid,
>> ret = do_wait(type, pid, options, infop, NULL, ru);
>> put_pid(pid);
>>
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +asmlinkage long sys_waitid(int which, pid_t upid,
>> + struct siginfo __user *infop, int options,
>> + struct rusage __user *ru)
>> +{
>> + long ret;
>> +
>> + ret = do_waitid(which, upid, infop, options, ru);
>> +
>> + if (ret > 0)
>> + ret = 0;
>> + else {
>> + /*
>> + * For a WNOHANG return, clear out all the fields
>> + * we would set so the user can easily tell the
>> + * difference.
>> + */
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_signo);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_code);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_pid);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_uid);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = put_user(0, &infop->si_status);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* avoid REGPARM breakage on x86: */
>> asmlinkage_protect(5, ret, which, upid, infop, options, ru);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
>> index e14a232..e8d4da6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ cond_syscall(sys_ioprio_set);
>> cond_syscall(sys_ioprio_get);
>>
>> /* New file descriptors */
>> +cond_syscall(sys_waitfd);
>> cond_syscall(sys_signalfd);
>> cond_syscall(sys_signalfd4);
>> cond_syscall(compat_sys_signalfd);
>>
Thanks for the review.
--CJD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists