linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix NFSD regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090106200854.GD5901@fieldses.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:08:54 -0500
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	hch@....de, jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix NFSD regression

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:56:11PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I've tested this and applied it for 2.6.29.
> > 
> > Though it only actually fixes the regression if your other patch ("CRED:
> > Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2")
> > is also applied.  I'd like to send in my pull request today, but I
> > usually try not to send a pull request whose tip doesn't pass at least
> > my basic regression tests....  And that other patch is outside my
> > baliwick.    Can someone else handle it?
> 
> Well, if you're willing to supply an Acked-by or Tested-by for one or both
> patches I can pass them on to James or Linus.

The nfsd-specific one I've already signed off on and queued for Linus.
For the other one, sure, for what it's worth:

	Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...i.umich.edu>

Thanks!--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/