[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231281801.11687.125.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:43:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]: mutex: adaptive spin
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:22 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > One of the things the previous patch did wrong was that it never tracked
> > the owner in the mutex fast path -- I initially didn't notice because I
> > had all debugging infrastructure enabled, and that short circuits all
> > the fast paths.
>
> Why even worry?
Wrong mind-set, as you rightly point out below.
> Just set the owner non-atomically. We can consider a NULL owner in the
> slow-path to be a "let's schedule" case. After all, it's just a
> performance tuning thing after all, and the window is going to be very
> small, so it won't even be relevant from a performance tuning angle.
>
> So there's _no_ reason why the fast-path can't just set owner, and no
> reason to disable preemption.
Agreed, when viewed from that angle all the little races don't matter.
> I also think the whole preempt_disable/enable around the
> mutex_spin_or_schedule() is pure garbage.
>
> In fact, I suspect that's the real bug you're hitting: you're enabling
> preemption while holding a spinlock. That is NOT a good idea.
spinlocks also fiddle with preempt_count, that should all work out -
although granted, it does look funny.
Indeed, the below does boot -- which means I get to sleep now ;-)
---
include/linux/mutex.h | 4 +--
include/linux/sched.h | 1
kernel/mutex-debug.c | 10 --------
kernel/mutex-debug.h | 8 ------
kernel/mutex.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
kernel/mutex.h | 2 -
kernel/sched.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mutex.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct mutex {
atomic_t count;
spinlock_t wait_lock;
struct list_head wait_list;
+ struct task_struct *owner;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
- struct thread_info *owner;
const char *name;
void *magic;
#endif
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ struct mutex {
struct mutex_waiter {
struct list_head list;
struct task_struct *task;
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
struct mutex *lock;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
void *magic;
#endif
};
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ extern signed long schedule_timeout(sign
extern signed long schedule_timeout_interruptible(signed long timeout);
extern signed long schedule_timeout_killable(signed long timeout);
extern signed long schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(signed long timeout);
+extern void mutex_spin_or_schedule(struct mutex_waiter *, long state, unsigned long *flags);
asmlinkage void schedule(void);
struct nsproxy;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/mutex-debug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/mutex-debug.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/mutex-debug.c
@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
/*
* Must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
*/
-void debug_mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *new_owner)
-{
- lock->owner = new_owner;
-}
-
void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
memset(waiter, MUTEX_DEBUG_INIT, sizeof(*waiter));
@@ -59,7 +54,6 @@ void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex
/* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
ti->task->blocked_on = waiter;
- waiter->lock = lock;
}
void mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
@@ -80,9 +74,8 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lo
return;
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current_thread_info());
+ /* DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current); */
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current_thread_info());
}
void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
@@ -95,7 +88,6 @@ void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
#endif
- lock->owner = NULL;
lock->magic = lock;
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/mutex-debug.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/mutex-debug.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/mutex-debug.h
@@ -13,14 +13,6 @@
/*
* This must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
*/
-extern void
-debug_mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *new_owner);
-
-static inline void debug_mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
-{
- lock->owner = NULL;
-}
-
extern void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
struct mutex_waiter *waiter);
extern void debug_mutex_wake_waiter(struct mutex *lock,
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/mutex.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const c
atomic_set(&lock->count, 1);
spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list);
+ lock->owner = NULL;
debug_mutex_init(lock, name, key);
}
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ void inline __sched mutex_lock(struct mu
* 'unlocked' into 'locked' state.
*/
__mutex_fastpath_lock(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_slowpath);
+ lock->owner = current;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock);
@@ -115,6 +117,7 @@ void __sched mutex_unlock(struct mutex *
* The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
* into 'unlocked' state:
*/
+ lock->owner = NULL;
__mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
}
@@ -127,7 +130,7 @@ static inline int __sched
__mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
unsigned long ip)
{
- struct task_struct *task = current;
+ struct task_struct *owner, *task = current;
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
unsigned int old_val;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -141,6 +144,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
/* add waiting tasks to the end of the waitqueue (FIFO): */
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
+ waiter.lock = lock;
old_val = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
if (old_val == 1)
@@ -175,19 +179,14 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
return -EINTR;
}
- __set_task_state(task, state);
- /* didnt get the lock, go to sleep: */
- spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- schedule();
- spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ mutex_spin_or_schedule(&waiter, state, &flags);
}
done:
lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
/* got the lock - rejoice! */
mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, task_thread_info(task));
- debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, task_thread_info(task));
/* set it to 0 if there are no waiters left: */
if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list)))
@@ -206,6 +205,7 @@ mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, un
{
might_sleep();
__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ lock->owner = current;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_nested);
@@ -213,16 +213,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_nested);
int __sched
mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ ret = __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ if (!ret)
+ lock->owner = current;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
int __sched
mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ ret = __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ if (!ret)
+ lock->owner = current;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
@@ -260,8 +272,6 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
}
- debug_mutex_clear_owner(lock);
-
spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
@@ -298,18 +308,30 @@ __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(atom
*/
int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath);
+ if (!ret)
+ lock->owner = current;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_interruptible);
int __sched mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_killable_slowpath);
+ if (!ret)
+ lock->owner = current;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_killable);
@@ -351,10 +373,9 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpa
spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
prev = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
- if (likely(prev == 1)) {
- debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, current_thread_info());
+ if (likely(prev == 1))
mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
- }
+
/* Set it back to 0 if there are no waiters: */
if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list)))
atomic_set(&lock->count, 0);
@@ -380,8 +401,13 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpa
*/
int __sched mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock)
{
- return __mutex_fastpath_trylock(&lock->count,
- __mutex_trylock_slowpath);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_trylock(&lock->count, __mutex_trylock_slowpath);
+ if (ret)
+ lock->owner = current;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4596,6 +4596,50 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+# include "mutex-debug.h"
+#else
+# include "mutex.h"
+#endif
+
+void mutex_spin_or_schedule(struct mutex_waiter *waiter, long state, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ struct mutex *lock = waiter->lock;
+ struct task_struct *task = waiter->task;
+ struct task_struct *owner = lock->owner;
+ struct rq *rq;
+
+ if (!owner)
+ goto do_schedule;
+
+ rq = task_rq(owner);
+
+ if (rq->curr != owner) {
+do_schedule:
+ __set_task_state(task, state);
+ spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
+ schedule();
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
+ for (;;) {
+ /* Stop spinning when there's a pending signal. */
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, task))
+ break;
+
+ /* Owner changed, bail to revalidate state */
+ if (lock->owner != owner)
+ break;
+
+ /* Owner stopped running, bail to revalidate state */
+ if (rq->curr != owner)
+ break;
+
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+ }
+ spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
+}
+
/*
* schedule() is the main scheduler function.
*/
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/mutex.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.h
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
#define mutex_remove_waiter(lock, waiter, ti) \
__list_del((waiter)->list.prev, (waiter)->list.next)
-#define debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, new_owner) do { } while (0)
-#define debug_mutex_clear_owner(lock) do { } while (0)
#define debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter) do { } while (0)
#define debug_mutex_free_waiter(waiter) do { } while (0)
#define debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, waiter, ti) do { } while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists