linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090106151344.0f146286.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:13:44 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@...s.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

(cc added)

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:57:44 -0500
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:43:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > softirq-introduce-statistics-for-softirq.patch
> > proc-export-statistics-for-softirq-to-proc.patch
> > proc-update-document-for-proc-softirqs-and-proc-stat.patch
> 
> Why is this in procfs?

softirq stuff in /proc seems appropriate?  It's alongside
/proc/interrupts.  We could put it in /trendy-fs-of-the-day, but what
would it gain us?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/