[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107074558.GA27881@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:45:58 -0800
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, roland@...hat.com,
bastian@...di.eu.org
Cc: daniel@...ac.com, xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7][v6] Container-init signal semantics
Container-init must behave like global-init to processes within the
container and hence it must be immune to unhandled fatal signals from
within the container (i.e SIG_DFL signals that terminate the process).
But the same container-init must behave like a normal process to
processes in ancestor namespaces and so if it receives the same fatal
signal from a process in ancestor namespace, the signal must be
processed.
Implementing these semantics requires that send_signal() determine pid
namespace of the sender but since signals can originate from workqueues/
interrupt-handlers, determining pid namespace of sender may not always
be possible or safe.
This patchset implements the design/simplified semantics suggested by
Oleg Nesterov. The simplified semantics for container-init are:
- container-init must never be terminated by a signal from a
descendant process.
- container-init must never be immune to SIGKILL from an ancestor
namespace (so a process in parent namespace must always be able
to terminate a descendant container).
- container-init may be immune to unhandled fatal signals (like
SIGUSR1) even if they are from ancestor namespace (SIGKILL is
the only reliable signal from ancestor namespace).
Patches in this set:
[PATCH 1/7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions
[PATCH 2/7] Protect init from unwanted signals more
[PATCH 3/7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal()
[PATCH 4/7] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()
[PATCH 5/7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
[PATCH 6/7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals
[PATCH 7/7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary
Changelog[v6]:
- Patches 3,4: Have kill_pid_info_as_uid() pass in 'from_ancestor_ns'
parameter to __send_signal() and remove SI_ASYNCIO check in
siginfo_from_user().
- Patches 4,6: Update changelog and simplify code
Changelog[v5]:
- Patch 2/6: Remove SIG_IGN check in sig_task_ignored() and let
sig_handler_ignored() check SIG_IGN.
- Patch 3/6. Put siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() back under CONFIG_PID_NS
and remove warning in rt_sigqueueinfo().
- (Patch 5/6)Simplify check in get_signal_to_deliver()
- (Patch 6/6)Simplify masquerading pid
- LTP-20081219-intermediate showed no new errors on 2.6.28-rc5-mm2.
Changelog[v4]:
- [Bugfix] Patch 3/7. Check ns == NULL in siginfo_from_ancestor_ns().
Although http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/502 makes it less likely
that ns == NULL, looks like an explicit check won't hurt ?
- Remove SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS flag and simplify logic as
suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
- Dropped patch that set SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS and set
SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE in patch 5/7 to be bisect-safe.
- Add a warning in rt_sigqueueinfo() if SI_ASYNCIO is used
(patch 3/7)
- Added two patches (6/7 and 7/7) to masquerade si_pid for
SI_USER and SI_TKILL
Changelog[v3]:
Changes based on discussions of previous version:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/25/458
Major changes:
- Define SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS and use in container-inits to
skip fatal signals from same namespace but process SIGKILL/SIGSTOP
from ancestor namespace.
- Use SI_FROMUSER() and si_code != SI_ASYNCIO to determine if
it is safe to dereference pid-namespace of caller. Highly
experimental :-)
- Masquerading si_pid when crossing namespace boundary: relevant
patches merged in -mm and dropped from this set.
Minor changes:
- Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions
- Update sig_ignored() to drop SIG_DFL signals to global init early
(tried to address Roland's and Oleg's comments)
- Use 'same_ns' flag to drop SIGKILL/SIGSTOP to cinit from same
namespace
TODO:
- Add a check in fs/proc/array.c:task_sig() to include SIG_DFL
signals from same namespace in 'ignored signals' set for
container/global init.
Limitations/side-effects of current design
- Container-init is immune to suicide - kill(getpid(), SIGKILL) is
ignored. Use exit() :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists