[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107075431.GA2457@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:54:31 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>,
ecryptfs-devel@...ts.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 06:25:04PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:15:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-tag-70-packets.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-header-updates.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-encoding-and-encryption-functions.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-filldir-lookup-and-readlink.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-mount-option.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-replace-%z-with-%z.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-fix-data-types-int-size_t.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-kerneldoc-for-ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet.patch
> > > > ecryptfs-clean-up-ecryptfs_decode_from_filename.patch
> > > > fs-ecryptfs-inodec-cleanup-kerneldoc.patch
> > >
> > > By using lookup_one_len on an arbitrary underlying filesystem this
> > > breaks the assumption that a nameidata is always available. Please
> > > redo to use proper lookup helpers.
> >
> > It that a nack, or do we think we can address this in the next week or
> > three?
>
> Together we the state of the rest of that code that's a NACK, yes :)
Umm, why did you you just push this in anyway without comment?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists