linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090106235943.d23b27c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:59:43 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>,
	ecryptfs-devel@...ts.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:54:31 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 06:25:04PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:15:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-tag-70-packets.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-header-updates.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-encoding-and-encryption-functions.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-filldir-lookup-and-readlink.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-mount-option.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-replace-%z-with-%z.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-fix-data-types-int-size_t.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-kerneldoc-for-ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet.patch
> > > > > ecryptfs-clean-up-ecryptfs_decode_from_filename.patch
> > > > > fs-ecryptfs-inodec-cleanup-kerneldoc.patch
> > > > 
> > > > By using lookup_one_len on an arbitrary underlying filesystem this
> > > > breaks the assumption that a nameidata is always available.  Please
> > > > redo to use proper lookup helpers.
> > > 
> > > It that a nack, or do we think we can address this in the next week or
> > > three?
> > 
> > Together we the state of the rest of that code that's a NACK, yes :)
> 
> Umm, why did you you just push this in anyway without comment?

I'd sent them before you sent your comments.  I didn't think I had
done that, so I didn't mention it earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/