[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107094328.GD3850@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:43:28 -0600
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK for SGI_SN systems
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:28:09AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That's basically what the HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK code does. It takes
> a tick timestamp and tries to improve on that by using strict per cpu
> sched_clock() deltas.
>
> What we do to obtain remote time, is basically calculate local time and
> pull remote time fwd if that was behind.
But what happens when the remote clock then takes a single tick and
pulls forward a different remote clock by both your tick and its tick.
Multiply that by 4096 and I am starting to feel that time is likely to
go racing forward in a really random fashion.
> While doing that, it filters out any backward motion and large fwd leaps
> so as to stay no worse than a jiffie clock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists