linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4964AF8D.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:35:09 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	<ccache@...ts.samba.org>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out
	 ccache/distcc

>>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> 07.01.09 12:31 >>>
>What is the gain/pain ratio here?

Certainly depends on the pov - it reduces the kernel module (disk) image
sizes quite a bit, so from a distro perspective its a move against the ever
growing package sizes (and the disk space) hundreds or even thousands
of modules require.

>Would it be a possibility to drop stripping off the
>crc symbols and go back to the ld method that
>is more ccache friendly?

That's certainly a possibility, but I have to admit that I'd like to keep the
option - a respective config option could default to 'no' if the build issues
are considered more significant. I'm really not that much worried about
adding another config parameter here...

>We would still benefir from all the other stripping done - no?

Yes.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/