[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107123504.GN32491@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:35:04 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10
On Wed, Jan 07 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:22:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > [ CCing Evgeniy and Herbert who also participate to the thread ]
> ...
> > Well, I've just tested it. It did not fix the problem but made it worse.
> ...
>
> Terrible mistake! Here is take 2.
Not sure what this:
> +static inline struct page *linear_to_page(struct page *page, unsigned int len,
> + unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + struct page *p = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> +
> + if (!p)
> + return NULL;
> + memcpy((void *)p + offset, (void *)page + offset, len);
is trying to do. I'm assuming you want to copy the page contents? If so,
you'd want something like
memcpy(page_address(p) + offset, page_address(page) + offset, len);
with possible kmaps for 'page'.
Irregardless of that particular oddity, I don't think this is the right
path to take at all. We need to delay the pipe buffer consumption until
the appropriate time.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists