[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107125756.GA32336@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:57:56 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:53:56PM +1100, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:52:01PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > Evgeniy, I'd like to understand something related to our apparent lack of
> > knowledge of when the data is effectively transmitted. If we're focusing
> > on the send part, I can't understand why I never reproduce the corruption
> > when the data source is a file or loopback, but I only see it when the source
> > is an ethernet interface. How is it possible that a problem affecting only
>
> It doesn't happen with a file because in that case you don't
> start with an skb so there is no skb->head. It probably doesn't
> happen with loopback because loopback does GSO so again skb->head
> does not exist (so to speak).
Yup, basically splice's transmit pipe buffer contains page references,
where the first one is actually not a real page but skb, while in the
case of sendfile() and/or splice() from the file first page is a real
page of the appropriate file.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists