[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4964C0A3.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:48:03 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: <ccache@...ts.samba.org>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out
ccache/distcc
>>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> 07.01.09 14:23 >>>
>On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:35:09PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> 07.01.09 12:31 >>>
>> >What is the gain/pain ratio here?
>>
>> Certainly depends on the pov - it reduces the kernel module (disk) image
>> sizes quite a bit, so from a distro perspective its a move against the ever
>> growing package sizes (and the disk space) hundreds or even thousands
>> of modules require.
>
>The kernel modules seldom export anything so the benefit is minimal here.
Not really, for highly modular distro kernels.
>I did a 15 minutes hack to try ripping the .c -> .s -> .o stuff out.
Looks good to me. In case you decide to revert the stuff for .29, I'll
merge this into my patch.
>Jan - I need some hard numbers to convince me that stripping the
>__crc symbols is worth it.
The on-disk size of the modules in my builds is reduced by about 5% with
this patch (but I can't immediately tell how much of this is due to __crc_*
vs. other symbol stripping).
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists