linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C1C62166118DFA4A8BBA01A2411F0D171224AED05D@PRI-MBX-101.dom1.vinci-energies.net>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:22:19 +0100
From:	BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@...lcc.com>
To:	Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
CC:	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Swierk [mailto:eswierk@...stanetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 11:14 PM
> To: BARRE Sebastien
> Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; David Brownell; Alessandro Zummo; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Andrew Morton
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:35 AM, BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@...lcc.com> wrote:
> > I've read your patch quicly, I will test it on my board as soon as
> possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > You can delete the next 3 lines, they are not useful:
> >
> >> +     ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
> currvalues);
> >> +     if (ret < 0)
> >> +             return ret;
>
> Oops! Here is an updated patch with these lines removed, and a minor
> formatting fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
>
> --Ed

I've tested the patch on my geode LX board with a DS1307 device.
It works well for me.

However I think writing the clock one byte at a time could cause strange behavior when using alarms on device like ds1337.

Tested-by: Sébastien Barré <sbarre@...lcc.com>

--
Sébastien Barré
Bureau d'étude - Développement
SDEL Contrôle Commande
D2A - Rue Nungesser et Coli
44860 Saint Aignan de Grand Lieu
FRANCE
Tél : +33(0)2 40 84 50 88
Fax : +33(0)2 40 84 51 10