linux-kernel - Re: nfsd stuckage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090107172238.GA15127@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:22:39 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hch@....de,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	neilb@...e.de, snakebyte@....de
Subject: Re: nfsd stuckage

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:56:39AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> OK.  Mind if we just revert the whole commit for now?  With the
> double-lock regression is still there for ecryptfs exports, then I'd
> rather do a simple revert of the whole patch and not try to pick out
> just the fs/nfsd/vfs.c part.

Umm, exporting ecryptfs would previously take the lower i_mutex in
the ecryptfs fsync method and now does in vfs_fsync, there should
be no changed in behaviour.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/