[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0901071814580.11407@ftp.linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: i8259.c fix style problems
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> @@ -11,15 +11,15 @@
> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> #include <linux/sysdev.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
> -#include <asm/acpi.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> -#include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/timer.h>
> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> -#include <asm/delay.h>
> #include <asm/desc.h>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/arch_hooks.h>
My feeling is this hunk and the following one should be submitted as
separate patches.
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
> outb_pic(0x11, PIC_MASTER_CMD); /* ICW1: select 8259A-1 init */
>
> /* ICW2: 8259A-1 IR0-7 mapped to 0x30-0x37 on x86-64,
> - to 0x20-0x27 on i386 */
> + to 0x20-0x27 on i386 */
> outb_pic(IRQ0_VECTOR, PIC_MASTER_IMR);
>
> /* 8259A-1 (the master) has a slave on IR2 */
I think the original formatting is more readable; I would align the two
'to's vertically even. You can fix the comment to adhere to the Linux
coding standard though and the whitespace "problem" will vanish
automagically.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists