[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090107.123954.257436361.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:39:54 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: jaswinder@...radead.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to
request_firmware()
From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:23:44 -0800
> The only testing that we were not able to do was the IPMI testing,
> because of the lack of resources. All other testing passed.
>
> While all other testing passed, I am concerned about not being able to
> test whether or not this change affects the ability to pass IPMI
> traffic. I am not sure if the "gain" of using request_firmware() out
> weighs the potential risk that IPMI traffic may be broken with this
> patch. I guess I wondering what the gain is in using the
> request_firmware() function?
>
> >From past experience with IPMI traffic and the e100, the loading of
> the microcode in the correct manner greatly affected whether IPMI
> traffic would pass or not.
Jeff, I've lost all of my patience.
All drivers are being converted this way. I fought against doing it
to tg3 for various reasons, but the tide worked against me and I
accepted that.
We can't hold this patch up forever for a potential problem that you
don't have the resources to even test for more than a week.
I'm therefore adding this patch, and we'll fix or revert if the
"possible" IPMI problems do surface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists